An Exploration of Modern Cannibalism

A Personal Exploratory

Essay/Commentary

Pertaining

to

The Relationship

Between

Cannibalism

and

Oral Sexual Exchange.

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

First a person must establish whether there is a similarity or no. Is oral sexual favor a form of cannibalism?

Literally, a person must recognize it as such. Yes, quite simply. Human proteins are being consumed during such activity by other humans.

Psychologically is entirely another thing.

This poses the question as to the relevance of psychological position. Is such psychological disposition a qualifier? Does it effect the result?

That brings more question;

If it is that oral sexual favor IS literal cannibalism as has been established, how is it then that our society has not manifested the same direct symptoms as other cannibalistic societies in the form of disease, poor development… physical change?

Are existing diseases within our society as result of the very common act of oral sexual favors

in some way?

Given that our societies are quite stable in regard to physical state, health, consistency, excepting of course those afflictions that are obviously associated with sexual activity and those that are common, though having no direct obvious relationship with sexual activities… it raises what I consider valid question pertaining to such subject matter.

Consider for a moment that in a very physical manner, there is really not much difference between those forms of cannibalism which actually consume flesh and those where-in human protein is consumed during acts of sexual pleasure. Quite literally, protein is protein in the physical sense. That leaves then the matter of intent being the only real difference.

I come to this realization based on the fact that oral sexual favor has been quite common in “civilized” societies for hundreds, even thousands of years with little or no obvious ill effect on the physical existence of humans. The contradiction isn’t glaring but is still there. How is it that one form of human protein ingestion can be such a detriment when another isn’t? It has to be the psychological difference actually effecting the result. Again I see no other reason than the intent.

Consider that thousands of years of ingesting human proteins physically, sexually, should be no different than the thousands of years of ingesting human proteins as sustenance in a physical manner, especially given that most cannibalistic societies didn’t/don’t survive exclusively on other human flesh. In a similar manner, the ingestion of human proteins as a pleasurable act is augmented in regard to dietary subject matter, with other food stuffs as well. It simply isn’t regarded as sustenance, physically.

Why the difference developmentally? Again, it has to be metaphysical/psychological intent.

A person eating the flesh of another human being, does so most times after an extended period filled with malicious intent. They mean to kill and consume.

A person ingesting human proteins, even daily… isn’t as such. The intention is meant to be pleasurable for all involved.

This taken into consideration and compared with/against the considerable difference in proven results pertaining to the two different types of cannibalism, would then logically lead to the idea that our mental state and intent… our metaphysical existence, has more than the topical effect on our reality and existence. Even more so than in just this one particular example/area.

How is it then, that we have removed ourselves from the conscious use of that obvious and very real effect?

Yes, there is the factor of modern medicines. Though, such a factor should be considered more in a different way within the light of realizing the effect and extent of effect within the human psyche on our existence as established through the simple comparison of these two forms of cannibalism.

Within the acts of fallacio and cunnilingus, passions are usually in quite the fever pitch.

In a basic sense, that fever pitch isn’t much different than that of the excitement within a hunt. The difference being is that both (all) parties involved in the oral pleasures, are definitely seeking that end result, where all parties involved in the act of the primal, sustenance type of cannibalism are not. Factually, at least one participant in the physical hunt and consumption of flesh is very much NOT interested in the desired out come, particularly knowing that their fate would be to die and be consumed.

Does the “fear” element discharge a certain type of chemical into that which is to be consumed (being the flesh of the victim), which could and does adversely effect the people consuming it?

Knowing that such does happen in some types of animals when being slaughtered, it isn’t so far fetched. The body does produce many types of chemicals in many different situations.

What of the effect and extended effect of human proteins being consumed during pregnancy? Are the effects of consuming human proteins detrimental to developing fetal embryo’s? How many people actually stop to consider it in our modern society, especially as common and accepted as oral sexual favor is (and always has been)? Some people even tout the positive psychological effect of sexual exchange during pregnancy… does this include oral favor and the inadvertent ingestion of human protein? A person would probably find it hard to say that it doesn’t. This means that there is a considerable percentage of humans that have gained sustenance while in the womb, from human proteins that the host has ingested.

What difference then is it from the infant being nurtured on the version of human protein which is breast milk? Odd contradiction isn’t it? The fact that breast milk is considered to be the optimum nutrition for the new infant, where consuming human flesh has been found to be incredibly detrimental to the existence and development of humans.

What then is the difference? Scientifically, protein is very much protein. Is there an element to existence that science does not apply to? Does not quite explain?

Thousands of years of ingesting human proteins in the form of sexual excretions and ejaculations. Even more in the form of ingesting human proteins as breast milk.

No adverse effect that we know of least a person consider existence itself to be an adverse result.

The consumption of proteins in the form of human flesh… even cooked and prepared in similar manners as is any other game flesh, have proven time and again to be physically detrimental. Most times beginning with the functions of the mind and thought, sanity.

I again find no other answer to my own question, than intent. Mental, psychological, metaphysical intent.

To consume human proteins while pursuing physical pleasures, affections… of and with all involved, seems to have no ill effect beyond the spread of sexually transmitted disease in some cases.

To consume human proteins in the form of breast milk, definitely has no ill effect and is actually preferred in that given situation as optimum.

Both of these instances reside firmly in the mutual positive outcome area of intent.

To hunt, kill and consume another human does not reside in the area of mutual positive outcome.

I can see no other real difference.

This observation proves beyond much doubt, that as creatures our psychological dispositions hold much more importance than many topically perceive on the health and well being of our existence and even on reality.

Existence is there fore, well beyond the confines of modern scientific limitations in many ways. Within this example particularly, quite un-arguably.

It is further then, more within our each and every influence and control, than many of us ever realize or believe. We simply have found comfortable standardization within the over emphasized consistencies which we expose ourselves to every day in various forms.

Such, in a more simple explanation, is the society and reality that we perpetuate and maintain. This very much through our repetitions and false freedom of choice. False freedom of choice meaning that what we consider freedom of choice is actually nothing more than a considerable amount of established, preconceived options from which to “choose.” Non of which really being outside of a given standard or norm… thus failing to actually be freedom. No choice within all of those known standards, is truly freedom… it is simply a more complex, sustained repetition which bears the illusion of freedom within the numerous possible selections. In essence it is very much in the manner of “You can choose anything that you will, as long as it is one of these already established selections.”

Our “progress” then within “society,” again… is very much proven to be nothing more than more confinement and removal from actual freedom. Time and again reinforcing that confinement through sustaining the repetition in choosing the established as “freedom” when really it is only comfort and consistency.

With that I believe I’ll close this exploration with a statement and the request for another old standard; “Blow is just an expression, ladies..... more elbow, less wrist.”